Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Millen Hurrion vs Jay Clarke Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hurrion vs Clarke analysis and find out who is favored!
Millen Hurrion vs Jay Clarke Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hurrion 1 - 0 Clarke
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hurrion has won 59.39% of points on their second serve, while Clarke has won 52.04%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hurrion, in recent form, has won 51.64% of their opponent's second serve points, while Clarke has won 54.34%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.44% and 39.07% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hurrion has saved 65.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Clarke has saved 57.35% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hurrion has won 60% of matches played (W/L 30/ 20), with Clarke winning 72.22% (W/L 52/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hurrion has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 48/ 25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4). Clarke has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 136/ 67), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 26% (W/L 10/ 29).
- Player level: In the last year, Hurrion has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 30/ 20), where as Clarke has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.13% of matches (W/L 49/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hurrion winning 1 times and Clarke being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hurrion winning 2 and Clarke winning 1. The last match between Hurrion and Clarke was at the M25 Sunderland, 16-01-2024, First, I.hard with Millen Hurrion getting the victory 6-3 3-6 4-1 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:56:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hurrion and Clarke have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hurrion winning 0 times and Clarke 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hurrion winning 0, and Clarke 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hurrion has played against opponents with an average rank of 216.34 while Clarke has played against players with an average rank of 176.82.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hurrion has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Clarke has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hurrion has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Clarke has converted 46.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
720
Rank
681
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
336
Rank
153
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
64% (83-46)
Career Total W/L
57% (277-205)
65% (11-6)
YTD W/L
71% (34-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$116,120
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Millen Hurrion | Jay Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:0 | 1:56:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (51/78) | 54% (44/81) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (34/51) | 73% (32/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (16/27) | 46% (17/37) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (32/81) | 36% (28/78) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 4-1 ret. |
Stats 
Millen Hurrion
Player
Jay Clarke
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Millen Hurrion | Jay Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (11/6) | 71% (34/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (25/15) | 66% (75/39) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (204/164) | 56% (603/477) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 74% (31/11) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 70% (7/3) | 50% (3/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 69 | 113 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 27 | 74 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:17 | 1:59:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 199.88 | 203.08 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (772/1134) | 59% (2006/3404) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (543/772) | 66% (1332/2006) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 59% (215/362) | 52% (725/1398) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (48/112) | 48% (206/432) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (441/1152) | 45% (1576/3512) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (11/6) | 72% (31/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (10/15) | 72% (33/46) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 63% (10/16) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 63% (10/16) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (11/9) | 93% (29/27) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 7% (29/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 37% (19/7) |
Millen Hurrion Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Millen Hurrion
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
56
Total Points Won
52
|
4-6 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Millen Hurrion
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
6-1 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Millen Hurrion
Player
Hady Habib
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Millen Hurrion
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
72%
(
78 of
109)
11
Aces
17
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
57 of
78)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
109)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vadym Ursu
Player
Millen Hurrion
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Millen Hurrion
Player
Evgeny Philippov
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Millen Hurrion
Player
Faris Zakaryia
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
40%
(
14 of
35)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
45
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Millen Hurrion
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Millen Hurrion
Player
Daniil Glinka
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
4
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Millen Hurrion
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
16 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jay Clarke Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Jay Clarke
53%
(
55 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
39%
(
19 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
43%
(
45 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
42%
(
18 of
43)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Koki Matsuda
34%
(
15 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Drazen Petrovic
37%
(
18 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Jay Clarke
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
6
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Matias Soto
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Juan Bautista Otegui
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(1) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Noa Vukadin
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Jay Clarke
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hurrion Vs Clarke Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Hurrion are available here and Clarke photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
